Managing your energy consumption could be very challenging predominantly during present electricity tariff and escalation of oil & gas prices. With the increasing of other production cost such as raw material and labour, reducing the energy cost may the only way for the company to remain competitive and stay in the business. This blog discusses all related issues in managing your energy consumption efficiently and in a systematic way.

Blog ini membincangkan mengenai sistem pengurusan tenaga dan pengunaan tenaga dengan cekap.

Monday, October 4, 2010

Feed_In_Tariff (FIT)


There is much talked about the FIT here in Malaysia currently. Below is the definition of FIT from Wikipedia. It was successfully implemented in Europe particularly in Germany and Spain, and spurred the RE business in Europe. We are still awaiting what is the tariff looks like once announced by the Government of Malaysia. Definitely, it will make RE player waiting anxiously. It is surprise to know that historically, this FIT was started in US in 1978 during the tenure of President Jimmy Carter, a country that still yet to ratify the Kyoto Protocol.

feed-in tariff (FiTfeed-in lawadvanced renewable tariff[1] or renewable energy payments[2]) is a policy mechanism designed to encourage the adoption of renewable energysources and to help accelerate the move toward grid parity.
It typically includes three key provisions[3]
  • guaranteed grid access
  • long-term contracts for the electricity produced
  • purchase prices that are methodologically based on the cost of renewable energy generation and tend towards grid parity.
Under a feed-in tariff, an obligation is imposed on regional or national electric grid utilities to buy renewable electricity (electricity generated from renewable sources, such as solar power, wind power, wave and tidal power, biomass, hydropower and geothermal power), from all eligible participants.[4].
The cost-based prices therefore enable a diversity of projects (wind, solar, etc.) to be developed, and for investors to obtain a reasonable return on renewable energy investments. This principle was first explained in Germany's 2000 RES Act:
“The compensation rates…have been determined by means of scientific studies, subject to the provision that the rates identified should make it possible for an installation – when managed efficiently – to be operated cost-effectively, based on the use of state-of-the-art technology and depending on the renewable energy sources naturally available in a given geographical environment.” (RES Act 2000, Explanatory Memorandum A)[5]
As a result, the rate may differ among various source of power generation, installation place (e.g. rooftop or ground-mounted), projects of different sizes and, sometime, by technology employed (solar, wind, geothermal, etc.). The rates are typically designed to ratchet downward over time to track technological change and overall cost reductions. This is consistent with keeping the payment levels in line with actual generation costs over time.
In addition, FITs typically offer a guaranteed purchase for electricity generated from renewable energy sources within long-term (15–25 year) contracts [6]. These contracts are typically offered in a non-discriminatory way to all interested producers of renewable electricity.
As of 2009, feed-in tariff policies have been enacted in 63 jurisdictions around the world, including in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iran, Republic of Ireland, Israel, Italy, the Republic of Korea, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey[7], and in some (nowadays, a dozen) states in the United States [8], and is gaining momentum in other ones as China, India and Mongolia.
In 2008, a detailed analysis by the European Commission concluded that "well-adapted feed-in tariff regimes are generally the most efficient and effective support schemes for promoting renewable electricity", going to grid parity.[9]. This conclusion has been supported by a number of recent analyses, including by the International Energy Agency [10],[11], the European Federation for Renewable Energy [12], as well as by Deutsche Bank [13]

No comments:

Post a Comment